[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is there any short syntax for REQUIRED_USE when a lot of USE flags need another one enabled?

Brian Harring posted on Sat, 17 Dec 2011 12:12:45 -0800 as excerpted: > On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:24:37AM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> I am referring in this case to abiword, it has a "plugins" USE flag >> that enables some minimal set of plugins and, then, a lot of USE flags >> for building extr

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any short syntax for REQUIRED_USE when a lot of USE flags need another one enabled?

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 11:24:37AM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > I am referring in this case to abiword, it has a "plugins" USE flag that > enables some minimal set of plugins and, then, a lot of USE flags for > building extra plugins (with extra dependencies). All of this extra > plugins need "plugi

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any short syntax for REQUIRED_USE when a lot of USE flags need another one enabled?

On 12/17/2011 02:24 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > I am referring in this case to abiword, it has a "plugins" USE flag that > enables some minimal set of plugins and, then, a lot of USE flags for > building extra plugins (with extra dependencies). All of this extra > plugins need "plugins" USE flag to be

[gentoo-portage-dev] Is there any short syntax for REQUIRED_USE when a lot of USE flags need another one enabled?

I am referring in this case to abiword, it has a "plugins" USE flag that enables some minimal set of plugins and, then, a lot of USE flags for building extra plugins (with extra dependencies). All of this extra plugins need "plugins" USE flag to be enabled. Is there any way to write a REQUIRED_USE