On 05/01/2013 02:42 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
>
> ZM> That commit allows backtracking to continue in the event that unsolved
> ZM> blockers are encountered, solving this bug:
>
> ZM> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465638
>
> I read the bug. But it was
> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
ZM> That commit allows backtracking to continue in the event that unsolved
ZM> blockers are encountered, solving this bug:
ZM> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465638
I read the bug. But it was the only commit that at first glance *could*
have been the
On 05/01/2013 01:56 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
>
> ZM> On 04/30/2013 11:19 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>>> My typical emerge -upvDN world went up from 10s of minutes to several
>>> hours sometime between portage 37f33e9 and 2d5e38b.
>
> ZM> I don't see any regressions on
> "ZM" == Zac Medico writes:
ZM> On 04/30/2013 11:19 PM, James Cloos wrote:
>> My typical emerge -upvDN world went up from 10s of minutes to several
>> hours sometime between portage 37f33e9 and 2d5e38b.
ZM> I don't see any regressions on my end. Please feel free to bisect those
ZM> commits
