Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph: eval disjunctive build deps earlier (bug 639346)

2017-12-07 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/04/2017 10:22 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 15:19:44 -0800 > Zac Medico wrote: > >> Since built-time deps tend to be a superset of run-time deps, evaluate >> disjunctive build-time deps before run-time deps, so that choices for >> build-time deps influence choices for run-ti

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe?

2017-12-07 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:07:21 -0800 as excerpted: > On 12/07/2017 12:37 AM, Duncan wrote: >> Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted: >> >>> On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote: As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe? It appears

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe?

2017-12-07 Thread Zac Medico
On 12/07/2017 12:37 AM, Duncan wrote: > Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted: > >> On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote: >>> As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe? >>> >>> It appears most of my clashing files are /usr/bin/* -> /bin/* symlinks. >>> (That's ju

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Is portage (/usr)/bin-merge safe?

2017-12-07 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted: > On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote: >> As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe? >> >> It appears most of my clashing files are /usr/bin/* -> /bin/* symlinks. >> (That's just bin, I've not looked at sbin.) > > I haven'