Hey!
I recently did some ia64-hpux hacking in prefix, and i stumbled over
alittle problem:
the native linker collects -L options on the command line, and python
uses -L. while building. this results in . beeing in rpath.
now when $PWD == $S, there is libpython-*.so, and executing the already
Hi!
i'm here to report ESTALE beeing missing on interix ;) seems like
portage is checking on it lately, so i required the attached patch to
get portage working on interix again (prefix).
any chance to get sth. alike in the svn tree? maybe a more generic
thing? but i guess that would not be
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:55 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
Hi!
i'm here to report ESTALE beeing missing on interix ;) seems like
portage is checking on it lately, so i required the attached patch to
get portage working on interix again (prefix).
djanderson pointed out that I could have made
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 11:05 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Duft wrote:
cool thanks :) so this patch makes portage merge in the order given on
the command line? this means it's the users fault if packages are in the
wrong order?
Right
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 08:35 +0200, Markus Duft wrote:
Hi!
I have a quick question: is --nodeps supposed to still merge packages in
the right order?
my specific problem is, that when i do this:
emerge -pv --noreplace --oneshot --nodeps \
sys-devel/gcc-config \
sys-devel/gcc
On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 02:14 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Markus Duft wrote:
Hi!
I have a quick question: is --nodeps supposed to still merge packages in
the right order?
Yes. The attached patch should fix it. Thanks for reporting.
cool
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:44 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
[snip]
While much of what you are talking about here mainly applies to prefix,
it looks to me from glancing over the code that you might of solved a
long standing problem in the embedded world with cross compiling via
portage. 222895 If
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 12:00 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 20-03-2009 11:35:09 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
i'll try and explain what i want in the first place: i'm porting things
to native windows. since windows isn't too cooperative, i'm unable to
merge most things (and with other things, i
On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 08:27 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 12:11 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:35 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
Hey guys :)
Just wanted to stop by and get some opinions on a patch i wrote for the
prefix branch.
[snip]
Hey
Hey guys :)
Just wanted to stop by and get some opinions on a patch i wrote for the
prefix branch.
i'll try and explain what i want in the first place: i'm porting things
to native windows. since windows isn't too cooperative, i'm unable to
merge most things (and with other things, i simply
On Fri, 2009-03-20 at 11:35 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
Hey guys :)
Just wanted to stop by and get some opinions on a patch i wrote for the
prefix branch.
argh... managed to fail to attach the patch _again_ :) at least i
managed to add the output stuff i mentioned before to the patch
11 matches
Mail list logo
