On 6/18/20 7:13 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:35:48 -0700
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> In the coroutine finally clause, do not call remove_writer in cases
>> where fd has been closed and then re-allocated to a concurrent
>> coroutine as in bug 716636.
>>
>> Also, assume that the
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 00:35:48 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> In the coroutine finally clause, do not call remove_writer in cases
> where fd has been closed and then re-allocated to a concurrent
> coroutine as in bug 716636.
>
> Also, assume that the caller will put the file in non-blocking mode
> and
In the coroutine finally clause, do not call remove_writer in cases
where fd has been closed and then re-allocated to a concurrent
coroutine as in bug 716636.
Also, assume that the caller will put the file in non-blocking mode
and close the file when done, so that this function is suitable for
