-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 17/05/16 15:48, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> Alexander, with 2.3.0_rc1-r1 released, I think we can re-open
> portage code for more patches before the official 2.3.0 release.
> We now know the split install is working, it only had the one
> portage bug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 16/05/16 21:20, Zac Medico wrote:
> Can we merge this now?
Yes!
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
On Mon, 16 May 2016 12:20:00 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 03/14/2016 11:36 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:26:23 +0100
> > Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> >
> >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> >> Hash: SHA512
> >
> >> I can't
On 03/14/2016 11:36 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:26:23 +0100
> Alexander Berntsen wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>
>> I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
>> please test this *a lot* before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016 11:26:23 +0100
Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
> please test this *a lot* before merging
On 03/14/2016 03:26 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
> please test this *a lot* before merging it.
Thanks. I'll test it a lot.
> Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has
> already been released: I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I can't say much more than "ACK, probably makes sense" really. But
please test this *a lot* before merging it.
Regarding the merging of this patch, and th egencache patch that has
already been released: I thought we agreed that .29 should be *only*
For parallel-install, lock package slots of the current package and
blocked packages, in order to account for blocked packages being
removed or replaced concurrently. Acquire locks in predictable order,
preventing deadlocks with competitors that may be trying to acquire
overlapping locks.