Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dep_zapdeps: fix virtual/rust handling (bug 645416)

2018-01-23 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/23/2018 03:11 PM, Alec Warner wrote: > I'm starting to be a bit sad about this for a couple of reasons. > > 1) dep_zapdeps is pretty big at this point, and every tweak for || () > just grows it. Do we have any idea: >   a) When dep_zapdeps will be 'done'? We're gradually approaching a point

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dep_zapdeps: fix virtual/rust handling (bug 645416)

2018-01-23 Thread Alec Warner
I'm starting to be a bit sad about this for a couple of reasons. 1) dep_zapdeps is pretty big at this point, and every tweak for || () just grows it. Do we have any idea: a) When dep_zapdeps will be 'done'? b) Plans for splitting it into more manageable pieces? 2) In general I worry that the l

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] dep_zapdeps: fix virtual/rust handling (bug 645416)

2018-01-22 Thread Zac Medico
Fix the code from bug 643974 to set the installed_downgrade flag only if the selected newer package is either installed or in the graph. This is currently needed for appropriate handling of virtual/rust-1.19.0, since there's an upgrade to dev-lang/rust-1.23.0 available which may not be desired sinc