Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] preserve-libs: handle manually removed libraries better (bug 599240)

2016-11-09 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/09/2016 03:49 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 09/11/16 10:05, Zac Medico wrote: >> Before a package is merge > +d Thanks, fixed. > Looks okay. What's the performance impact, if non-negligible? It's negligible. The relevant code already executes a couple of other times while merging a

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] preserve-libs: handle manually removed libraries better (bug 599240)

2016-11-09 Thread Alexander Berntsen
On 09/11/16 10:05, Zac Medico wrote: > Before a package is merge +d Looks okay. What's the performance impact, if non-negligible? -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] preserve-libs: handle manually removed libraries better (bug 599240)

2016-11-09 Thread Zac Medico
Before a package is merge, prune any libraries from the registry that no longer exist on disk, in case they have been manually removed. This has to be done prior to merge, since after merge it is non-trivial to distinguish these files from files that have just been merged. X-Gentoo-Bug: 599240