W dniu sob, 03.03.2018 o godzinie 14∶50 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Sat, 03 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > I don't really want to go into this. As far as I'm concerned, I can
> > leave defunct '-d' and just check dev profiles unconditionally.
>
> WFM. Or even better
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> I don't really want to go into this. As far as I'm concerned, I can
> leave defunct '-d' and just check dev profiles unconditionally.
WFM. Or even better, leave defunct -d/--include-dev in place (in order
not to break peoples' scripts) and add a lo
W dniu sob, 03.03.2018 o godzinie 13∶08 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Sat, 03 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > It seems counter-intuitive for a simple binary option to require an
> > > argument. What is wrong with specifying -d to enable the option,
> > > and simply no
> On Sat, 03 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
>> It seems counter-intuitive for a simple binary option to require an
>> argument. What is wrong with specifying -d to enable the option,
>> and simply not specifying it to disable?
> What is wrong is that a number of developers have historically no
W dniu sob, 03.03.2018 o godzinie 12∶48 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
>
>
> > parser.add_argument(
> > '-d', '--include-dev-profiles', choices=('y', 'n'),
> > metavar='',
> > - default='n',
> > +
> On Sat, 3 Mar 2018, Michał Górny wrote:
> parser.add_argument(
> '-d', '--include-dev-profiles', choices=('y', 'n'),
> metavar='',
> - default='n',
> + default='y',
> help='include dev profiles in dependency checks')
It seems count
Enable testing 'dev' profiles by default. Those profiles are in the way
of becoming stable, and therefore it is crucial that developers test
that their changes do not break them. Instead of requiring developers
to explicitly type 'repoman full -d' all the time, just test them
by default.
---
repom