Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks like a hack to me.
It doesn't seem too bad to me.
It doesn't
On 04/24/2010 11:00 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks like a hack to me.
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:27:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/24/2010 11:00 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to
On Sat, 2010-04-24 at 20:00 +0200, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Am 24.04.2010 13:32, schrieb Gentoo:
On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 22:31 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 04/23/2010 05:43 AM, Sebastian Luther wrote:
Someone might come up with some logic to detect new use flags in
*DEPEND, but this looks
Hi everyone!
Some weeks ago [1] portage changed its behavior regarding what gets
stored as *DEPEND in the vdb. The curret behavior is to store the
*DEPEND variables with evaluated use conditionals. That is, if the
package has DEPEND=foo? ( cat/pkg2 ), either DEPEND=cat/pkg2 or
DEPEND= end up in
