Am 04.01.2014 22:49, schrieb Sebastian Luther:
> Am 04.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
>> On Saturday 04 January 2014 09:56:28 Brian Dolbec wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and
needed) to get
Am 04.01.2014 15:56, schrieb Brian Dolbec:
> On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and
>> needed) to get a newer portage version including fixes from git,
>> some of them important like:
>> https://bugs.gent
Am 04.01.2014 16:03, schrieb Mike Frysinger:
> On Saturday 04 January 2014 09:56:28 Brian Dolbec wrote:
>> On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>>> I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and
>>> needed) to get a newer portage version including fixes from
>>> git
On Saturday 04 January 2014 09:56:28 Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed)
> > to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them
> > important like:
> > https://bugs.
On Sat, 2014-01-04 at 15:28 +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Hello
>
> I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed)
> to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them
> important like:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490362
>
> Not sure if I can
Hello
I think this was pointed some days ago, but would be nice (and needed)
to get a newer portage version including fixes from git, some of them
important like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=490362
Not sure if I can contribute with something on this, but if you thing
so, please let me