On Saturday 21 January 2006 22:39, Marius Mauch wrote:
Check the archives for gentoo-dev and gentoo-server, several
implementation plans have been presented in the not-so-distant past.
However everyone seems to have a slightly different goal he wants to
achieve, so maybe the best would be for
On Sunday 22 January 2006 13:02, Marius Mauch wrote:
Well, posting YAIP (yet another implementation plan) won't really help
either.
Correct, plans never seem to go anywhere in regards to this...
Don't see the goal here, just the constraints. Are you after a
non-moving tree, a tree with just
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:02:37 -0600 Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Sunday 22 January 2006 13:02, Marius Mauch wrote:
| Well, posting YAIP (yet another implementation plan) won't really
| help either.
|
| Correct, plans never seem to go anywhere in regards to this...
Because no-one has yet
On Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:02:37 -0600
Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 22 January 2006 13:02, Marius Mauch wrote:
Well, posting YAIP (yet another implementation plan) won't really
help either.
Correct, plans never seem to go anywhere in regards to this...
Don't see the goal
Mikey wrote:
I have been emailing the published addresses for GLEP 19 for 2 months now
with no success. I am very interested in any ideas or projects that might
help gentoo be more server friendly, in an enterprise environment, for
lack of a better term.
I have an idea towards stabilizing
I have been emailing the published addresses for GLEP 19 for 2 months now
with no success. I am very interested in any ideas or projects that might
help gentoo be more server friendly, in an enterprise environment, for
lack of a better term.
I have an idea towards stabilizing portage for
