On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 11:33:02AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Sunday 20 November 2005 01:11, Brian Harring wrote:
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 12:50:25AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
regarding FsLocks and keeping fds open while unlocked
I still don't see why fds should remain open after all
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 01:12:46PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
+++ ./pym/portage_locks.py 2005-11-16 01:56:25.152161768 -0500
@@ -358,3 +359,91 @@
+# should the fd be left open indefinitely?
+# IMO, it shouldn't, but opening/closing everytime around is expensive
It should be
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 16:16, Alec Warner wrote:
Brian asked me to split this up, and the first patch had some
cruft...and I broke things, both from old messing around. So I started
with a clean installed of rc7, hopefully these are a bit better.
One patch is for the backend stuff,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian asked me to split this up, and the first patch had some
cruft...and I broke things, both from old messing around. So I started
with a clean installed of rc7, hopefully these are a bit better.
One patch is for the backend stuff,
