Zac Medico posted on Thu, 07 Dec 2017 01:07:21 -0800 as excerpted:
> On 12/07/2017 12:37 AM, Duncan wrote:
>> Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted:
>>
>>> On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote:
As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe?
It appears
On 12/07/2017 12:37 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted:
>
>> On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote:
>>> As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe?
>>>
>>> It appears most of my clashing files are /usr/bin/* -> /bin/* symlinks.
>>> (That's ju
Zac Medico posted on Fri, 31 May 2013 22:49:02 -0700 as excerpted:
> On 05/31/2013 10:36 PM, Duncan wrote:
>> As in subject, is portage bin/usr-bin merge safe?
>>
>> It appears most of my clashing files are /usr/bin/* -> /bin/* symlinks.
>> (That's just bin, I've not looked at sbin.)
>
> I haven'
viv...@gmail.com posted on Sun, 02 Jun 2013 14:47:54 +0200 as excerpted:
> In the meantime these commands results should tell you about equery
> belongs:
>
>>hom>vivo$ qlist coreutils | grep -c '^/bin/'
> 0
>>hom>vivo$ qlist coreutils | grep -c '^/usr/bin/'
> 101
>
>>hom>vivo$ equery belongs /us
On 06/02/13 13:54, Duncan wrote:
> viv...@gmail.com posted on Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:14:41 +0200 as excerpted:
>
>> While portage can be safe, for various reason (including the resultant
>> pkg) I do prefer to do the move in post_src_install() #1 All my tests
>> have been done against a manually conve
viv...@gmail.com posted on Sun, 02 Jun 2013 13:14:41 +0200 as excerpted:
> While portage can be safe, for various reason (including the resultant
> pkg) I do prefer to do the move in post_src_install() #1 All my tests
> have been done against a manually converted filesystem
That's what mine would
