On Thursday 02 February 2006 21:12, Brian Harring wrote:
> Yo...
>
> attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of
> testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior.
>
> So... giving it a few days, nows the time to bitch if you dislike the
> implementation (and no, I'
Yo...
attached is a patch enabling confcache support for portage. Lots of
testing, plus fixups from comments from folks prior.
So... giving it a few days, nows the time to bitch if you dislike the
implementation (and no, I'm not rewriting all of doebuild just for
this :)
~harring
Index: pym/p
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 05:18 -0800, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:37:07PM -0500, solar wrote:
> > On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 00:30 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
> > >
> > > +os.makedirs(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], mode=07
On Wed, Jan 25, 2006 at 12:30:22AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> it seems there's an external confcache binary but I can't tell much
> beyond that.
Yes, it's external (standalone) now- dev-util/confcache.
~harring
pgp4K5t0iJcYM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 03:37:07PM -0500, solar wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 00:30 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > +os.makedirs(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], mode=0775)
> > +os.chown(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], portage_uid, -1
On Wed, 2006-01-25 at 00:30 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> +os.makedirs(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], mode=0775)
> +os.chown(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], portage_uid, -1)
>
> This will die when running as non-root, no? "ebuild" is no
On Tuesday 24 January 2006 21:50, Brian Harring wrote:
+os.makedirs(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], mode=0775)
+os.chown(mysettings["CONFCACHE_DIR"], portage_uid, -1)
This will die when running as non-root, no? "ebuild" is now oft used by devs
running as normal users which will be broken by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Harring wrote:
> Yo.
>
> Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
> near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
> so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
> when ra
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 04:50:31 -0800
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yo.
>
> Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
> near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
> so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
Yo.
Looking to integrate confcache support into trunk some time in the
near future- had users testing it for about 2 months (give or take),
so far it's behaved pretty decently. A few packages eat themselves
when ran with --cache (bad autotooling), hence the addition of
restrict="confcache" be
Hola all.
Wrote another confcache implementation (this time not bound to ebd
thank god), and stuck an ebuild and portage patch for it in
http://dev.gentoo.org/~ferringb/confcache/ .
Should be a bit stricter then the 2.1 implementation; for those not
aware of what it is, it's a global autoconf
11 matches
Mail list logo
