Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.1 and gentoolkit-0.2.2

2006-06-01 Thread Paul Varner
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 18:20 -0400, Ned Ludd wrote: > Things can be fast tracked if it's better for the overall health of the > tree. The 30 thing is just a general guideline and more so before we > had any arch teams/ATs/etc... Now that we have arch teams the QA/stable > process has been highly

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.1 and gentoolkit-0.2.2

2006-05-31 Thread Ned Ludd
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 14:49 -0500, Paul Varner wrote: > Just a reminder that due to the changes in portage-2.1, that it breaks > gentoolkit-0.2.1 which is the current stable version. I have placed > gentoolkit-0.2.2 in the tree which works with portage-2.1 and opened bug > #135068

[gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.1 and gentoolkit-0.2.2

2006-05-31 Thread Paul Varner
Just a reminder that due to the changes in portage-2.1, that it breaks gentoolkit-0.2.1 which is the current stable version. I have placed gentoolkit-0.2.2 in the tree which works with portage-2.1 and opened bug #135068 I have not added the arch teams to the bug si