On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:53:05AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Friday 02 September 2005 08:04, Brian Harring wrote:
> >
> > Like I've said, EAPI is ebuild specific. Ebuild is a format; eapi
> > defines revisions of it, in my mind a minor revision of the ebuild 1
> > format. Any form of loss
On Friday 02 September 2005 08:04, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> Like I've said, EAPI is ebuild specific. Ebuild is a format; eapi
> defines revisions of it, in my mind a minor revision of the ebuild 1
> format. Any form of loss of backwards compatability *should* be a
> different format, .ebuild2 for
On Friday 02 September 2005 07:27, Zac Medico wrote:
> Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 August 2005 14:57, Brian Harring wrote:
> >> Re: tagging EAPI at the top of a file, infra would probably shoot me
> >> for doing such- till a live, fully compatible and *roughly*
> >> equivalent parser
