Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 29 October 2005 13:20, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I've adjusted the patch a bit to make all method signature changes into
keyword arguments. I've also change the default tree to None and added a
warning message to doebuild when None is passed and defaulting it to tree
t
On Saturday 29 October 2005 13:20, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> I've adjusted the patch a bit to make all method signature changes into
> keyword arguments. I've also change the default tree to None and added a
> warning message to doebuild when None is passed and defaulting it to tree
> there. With the E
On Friday 28 October 2005 19:35, Zac Medico wrote:
> Brian Harring wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:50:02PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> >>On Wednesday 26 October 2005 23:56, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> >>>I've attached a quickly thrown together patch for it, which works here,
> >>> but we really ne
Hi,
I would like to work on making the compression program used by portage a
configurable option.
I would like to start with binary packages, but eventually make all of
portage more flexible (man, info, doc, etc).
What would be the best route to pursue this if I wish to keep the gentoo
dev's rec
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 08:26 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Thursday 27 October 2005 08:04, m h wrote:
> > Hmmm, then I must be missing where the spec file gets generated,
> > because there is no code in ebuild.py that does it...
>
> ebuild.py..? Are you using 2.1.0_alphayymmdd? You may very well
Brian Harring wrote:
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 11:50:02PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Wednesday 26 October 2005 23:56, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I've attached a quickly thrown together patch for it, which works here, but
we really need to get this whole thing down pat. Perhaps usage of doebuild
wit
