Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] making the tree depend on portage
Jason Stubbs wrote: On Tuesday 20 December 2005 21:42, Francesco Riosa wrote: Whenever we want/need to make structural changes to the tree that are going to break backwards compability we have a serious problem [...] Just throwing random thoughts here, but Would a rescue-portage help on this ? It's easy enough to install portage from sources (for the time being) that I'd say it's not necessary at this stage. A HOWTO on the matter would be much quicker and easier to maintain while it remains viable. (-: great :-) -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] making the tree depend on portage
On Tuesday 20 December 2005 23:15, Jason Stubbs wrote: On Tuesday 20 December 2005 01:49, Marius Mauch wrote: Also not talking about implementation details yet, just after comments about the general idea of forced portage updates. I gave it a go anyway... ;) Also needed: Index: portage.py === --- portage.py (revision 2414) +++ portage.py (working copy) @@ -6742,7 +6742,7 @@ mtimedbkeys=[ updates, info, version, starttime, -resume, ldpath +resume, ldpath, last_system_check ] mtimedbfile=root+var/cache/edb/mtimedb try: -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
