Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.1_pre2 and new use flag showing with emerge -p
On Monday 26 December 2005 07:18, Petteri Räty wrote: I propose we improve the emerge -pv output to be something like the following: [ebuild U ] media-sound/alsa-driver-1.0.10-r1 [1.0.10] NEW=-debug OLD=-doc oss 0 kB This would keep the functionality with --verbose. The NEW and OLD variables have no meaning. USE have been put there because any USE_EXPAND flags found in IUSE are represented separately. For example: [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6 USE=-bitmap-fonts cjk -debug -dlloader -dmx -doc font-server -insecure-drivers -ipv6 -minimal -nls -nocxx opengl -pam -sdk -static truetype-fonts -type1-fonts -xprint xv INPUT_DEVICES=-synaptics -wacom 44,520 kB I doubt that the NEW and OLD would really be visible in the --verbose output in the general case anyway. How about just making added flags green to match the output of changed flags? -- Jason Stubbs -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.1_pre2 and new use flag showing with emerge -p
Jason Stubbs wrote: On Monday 26 December 2005 07:18, Petteri Räty wrote: I propose we improve the emerge -pv output to be something like the following: [ebuild U ] media-sound/alsa-driver-1.0.10-r1 [1.0.10] NEW=-debug OLD=-doc oss 0 kB This would keep the functionality with --verbose. The NEW and OLD variables have no meaning. USE have been put there because any USE_EXPAND flags found in IUSE are represented separately. For example: [ebuild R ] x11-base/xorg-x11-6.8.2-r6 USE=-bitmap-fonts cjk -debug -dlloader -dmx -doc font-server -insecure-drivers -ipv6 -minimal -nls -nocxx opengl -pam -sdk -static truetype-fonts -type1-fonts -xprint xv INPUT_DEVICES=-synaptics -wacom 44,520 kB I doubt that the NEW and OLD would really be visible in the --verbose output in the general case anyway. How about just making added flags green to match the output of changed flags? Green would probably work. Maybe best to change it for -p too then to have -v do what is supposed to do, that is to give extra information. Maybe we could also change the - in front of the turned of use flags to some other color than the flag itself to make it stand out. It took me a while to notice it was there. Regards, Petteri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-portage-dev] minimal python version required
Yo. So I'm getting antsy, and looking to start using fun features like sets, generator expressions, etc. Not a 2.2 thing however. So the question is, when are we going to give the finger to 2.2 and move forward? :) ~harring pgpjw5zAtLPH9.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] minimal python version required
On Tuesday 27 December 2005 00:52, Brian Harring wrote: So I'm getting antsy, and looking to start using fun features like sets, generator expressions, etc. Not a 2.2 thing however. So the question is, when are we going to give the finger to 2.2 and move forward? :) i think it's safe to give it the finger now 2.3 python has been stable on x86 for pretty much 2 years now -mike -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
