Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] --nospinner in emerge_default_opts

2006-01-28 Thread Alec Warner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Andrew Gaffney wrote: > William Hubbs wrote: > >> I just ran a test with this again, and it does look like "--nospinner" >> is not allowed in emerge_default_opts. >> >> If this should be filed as a bug, let me know, or if it isn't a bug, >> would it b

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] --nospinner in emerge_default_opts

2006-01-28 Thread Andrew Gaffney
William Hubbs wrote: I just ran a test with this again, and it does look like "--nospinner" is not allowed in emerge_default_opts. If this should be filed as a bug, let me know, or if it isn't a bug, would it be possible to allow this option? Is there a reason you can't just alias it? -- Andr

[gentoo-portage-dev] --nospinner in emerge_default_opts

2006-01-28 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, I just ran a test with this again, and it does look like "--nospinner" is not allowed in emerge_default_opts. If this should be filed as a bug, let me know, or if it isn't a bug, would it be possible to allow this option? Thanks much, William

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-default-opts

2006-01-28 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, disreguard this message; it seems to work now. I didn't change anything so I have no idea what happened. Thanks, William On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:25:18PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I am doing

[gentoo-portage-dev] emerge-default-opts

2006-01-28 Thread William Hubbs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 All, I'm not sure if this is a bug or if I am doing something wrong. I have portage 2.1_pre4 installed and the following in make.conf: EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--nocolor --nospinner" But at least the "--nospinner" option isn't working. Since I am blin

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] rsync metadata cache patch (obsoletes metadata transfer on sync)

2006-01-28 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 11:24:18AM -0600, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: > >I have reimplemented the previous patch as a normal cache module that adds > >a writable layer on top of the pre-generated metadata. If you'd like to > >try this out (with portage-2.1_preX), simply copy metada

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] rsync metadata cache patch (obsoletes metadata transfer on sync)

2006-01-28 Thread Brian Harring
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 02:39:42AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > def _delitem(self, cpv): > try: > del self.db_rw[cpv] > except KeyError, ke: > if not self.db_ro.has_key(cpv): > raise ke You ne

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] rsync metadata cache patch (obsoletes metadata transfer on sync)

2006-01-28 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Zac Medico wrote: I have reimplemented the previous patch as a normal cache module that adds a writable layer on top of the pre-generated metadata. If you'd like to try this out (with portage-2.1_preX), simply copy metadata_overlay.py into /usr/lib/portage/pym/cache/ and add portdbapi.auxdbmo

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] rsync metadata cache patch (obsoletes metadata transfer on sync)

2006-01-28 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: > I was playing with the metadata cache stuff this weekend and decided to > write a patch that obsoletes metadata transfers on sync. I have reimplemented the previous patch as a normal cache module that adds a writable layer on top