Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rumen Yotov wrote: On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. [1]http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_pre5 .ebuild Hi, The install went w/o errors, but there's a problem afterwards. Before ever seeing 2.1-pre5 had an error (confcache) using 2.1-pre4, patched with 'confcache-final' + 'atomic-write' patches using FEATURES=confcache. Same with 2.1_pre5 (fcron-3.0.1). Thanks for testing. I think it will be a good release but it's nice to have a few different people try it before unleashing it. After disabling '...confcache...' in /etc/make.conf fcron-3.0.1 compiles OK. Should i file a Bug as i don't want to pollute the ML with error logs. Thanks for your work.Rumen I got curious and tried to compile fcron-3.0.0 with confcache-0.4.1 but got a permission denied error for /etc/shadow. I was able to compile it successfully with confcache enabled after I disabled userpriv (FEATURES=-userpriv). See the attached error log. Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD/CGR/ejvha5XGaMRAkzKAJ0UKqUmMBwEsi0jnwBdN417cxoKIQCdE5m5 8qm1+nI5Hfum9JAcPt1BhPg= =pft0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- updating cache config.cache configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating doc/Makefile config.status: creating doc/stylesheets/fcron-doc.dsl config.status: creating config.h Summary : --- run in debug mode by default : no PAM : yes SELinux : no Run without root's rights : no fcron's user (resp. group) name : cron (resp. cron) sysfcrontab : yes (systab) spooldir : /var/spool/cron Load average support : yes compile fcrondyn : yes You can now run 'make' to compile and then (as root) 'make install' to install fcron. Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/confcache, line 546, in ? sys.exit(c.run(args)) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 207, in run self._update(new_loc, curdir) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 242, in _update self.file_db[f] = md5_file(f) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 32, in lambda md5_file = lambda x: fchksum.fmd5t(x)[0] IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/etc/shadow' !!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org: !!! /mnt/storage/primary/var/tmp/portage/fcron-3.0.0/work/fcron-3.0.0/config.log !!! ERROR: sys-process/fcron-3.0.0 failed. Call stack: ebuild.sh, line 1953: Called dyn_compile ebuild.sh, line 968: Called src_compile fcron-3.0.0.ebuild, line 66: Called econf 'compile' '--with-pam' '--without-selinux' '--without-debug' '--with-username=cron' '--with-groupname=cron' '--with-piddir=/var/run' '--with-etcdir=/etc/fcron' '--with-spooldir=/var/spool/cron' '--with-fifodir=/var/run' '--with-sendmail=/usr/sbin/sendmail' '--with-fcrondyn=yes' '--with-editor=/bin/nano' '--with-shell=/bin/sh' '--with-rootname=root' !!! econf failed !!! If you need support, post the topmost build error, and the call stack if relevant.
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
upgrade to 0.4.2 ... On Wed, Feb 22, 2006 at 12:32:19AM -0800, Zac Medico wrote: updating cache config.cache configure: creating ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating doc/Makefile config.status: creating doc/stylesheets/fcron-doc.dsl config.status: creating config.h Summary : --- run in debug mode by default : no PAM : yes SELinux : no Run without root's rights : no fcron's user (resp. group) name : cron (resp. cron) sysfcrontab : yes (systab) spooldir : /var/spool/cron Load average support : yes compile fcrondyn : yes You can now run 'make' to compile and then (as root) 'make install' to install fcron. Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/confcache, line 546, in ? sys.exit(c.run(args)) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 207, in run self._update(new_loc, curdir) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 242, in _update self.file_db[f] = md5_file(f) File /usr/bin/confcache, line 32, in lambda md5_file = lambda x: fchksum.fmd5t(x)[0] IOError: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/etc/shadow' !!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org: !!! /mnt/storage/primary/var/tmp/portage/fcron-3.0.0/work/fcron-3.0.0/config.log ~harring pgpp0GUtZVBEv.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
On Wednesday 22 February 2006 10:32, Zac Medico wrote: Rumen Yotov wrote: On Wednesday 22 February 2006 03:07, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. [1]http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/overlay/sys-apps/portage/portage-2.1_p re5 .ebuild Hi, The install went w/o errors, but there's a problem afterwards. Before ever seeing 2.1-pre5 had an error (confcache) using 2.1-pre4, patched with 'confcache-final' + 'atomic-write' patches using FEATURES=confcache. Same with 2.1_pre5 (fcron-3.0.1). Thanks for testing. I think it will be a good release but it's nice to have a few different people try it before unleashing it. After disabling '...confcache...' in /etc/make.conf fcron-3.0.1 compiles OK. Should i file a Bug as i don't want to pollute the ML with error logs. Thanks for your work.Rumen I got curious and tried to compile fcron-3.0.0 with confcache-0.4.1 but got a permission denied error for /etc/shadow. I was able to compile it successfully with confcache enabled after I disabled userpriv (FEATURES=-userpriv). See the attached error log. Zac Hi, Disabling 'userpriv' solved the issue for me too, no more confcache errors. Thanks.Rumen pgp6aIJS13KqS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. The only thing that I have noted so far is that every emerge command is printing ** before it does anything else. For example: # emerge -pv portage ** These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ] sys-apps/portage-2.1_pre5 USE=-build -doc 0 kB [1] Total size of downloads: 0 kB Portage overlays: [1] /usr/local/portage Regards, Paul -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' doesn't get along with it very well. # genlop -t screen * app-misc/screen snip Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds. The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the effects of enabling confcache Regards, Paul -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
Paul Varner wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' doesn't get along with it very well. # genlop -t screen * app-misc/screen snip Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds. The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the effects of enabling confcache I did make some minor grammar changes to the log output that could cause odd times. Other than that, no clue on this one. Regards, Paul -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Paul Varner wrote: On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 20:07 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: Your testing is appreciated. I'll file a bug for this one, once I investigate further. 'genlop -t' doesn't get along with it very well. # genlop -t screen * app-misc/screen snip Thu Dec 15 23:10:28 2005 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 1 minute and 11 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:11:30 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 2 minutes and 13 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:04 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 6 minutes and 47 seconds. Wed Feb 22 13:16:47 2006 app-misc/screen-4.0.2-r4 merge time: 5 days, 14 hours, 7 minutes and 30 seconds. The last three emerges were done with 2.1_pre5 where I was testing the effects of enabling confcache After you've updated to the new ebuild (with patch), run `sed -i 's/ Emerging/ emerge/g' /var/log/emerge.log` and genlop should work correctly again. Zac -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD/R9s/ejvha5XGaMRAk3RAJ9AEi+miC8eXju0u3ZOILIlPG9UaQCgrUTz u9HxdCRuVkj6/RwlkTUJmak= =r7kR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage-2.1_pre5
On Wed, 2006-02-22 at 18:35 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: After you've updated to the new ebuild (with patch), run `sed -i 's/ Emerging/ emerge/g' /var/log/emerge.log` and genlop should work correctly again. Did all of the above and everything is looking good. Thanks for the quick response Regards, Paul -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
