Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [rfc] variable naming for marking binaries as QA ignorable

2006-03-06 Thread Ned Ludd
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 09:21 +0100, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:46:25 -0500 > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sunday 05 March 2006 19:48, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > > > This could be done via the profiles, perhaps - package.qa, something > > > lik

[gentoo-portage-dev] factoring miscellaneous shell code and logic out of ebuild.sh (into doebuild)

2006-03-06 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, The current state of ebuild.sh is that it's been abused to perform miscellaneous shell tasks that are triggered before or after various ebuild phases. In order to rectify the situation, I propose that we factor out any logic and shell

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [rfc] variable naming for marking binaries as QA ignorable

2006-03-06 Thread Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo)
On Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:46:25 -0500 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 05 March 2006 19:48, Kevin F. Quinn (Gentoo) wrote: > > This could be done via the profiles, perhaps - package.qa, something > > like package.mask/use/keywords: > > i hate such things ... imo this information