On Thursday 16 March 2006 15:24, Brian Harring wrote:
I would have called bincompat BINSLOT, but the idea is the same.
> As per the norm, requires a smart resolver; for c++ would expect
> cycles to occur where the only solution is to pull in libstdc++ (fex)
> to sidestep horkage while doing the re
On Thursday 16 March 2006 15:18, tvali wrote:
> > To make this things worse, the above example assumes that within a
> > slot, the libraries are binary compatible. There are examples of
> > libraries that are not. And what about a library whose interface is
> > dependent on a third library: B uses
On 2006-03-15 19:06, Pingveno uttered these thoughts:
> Hi,
>I just recently finished an installation KDE 3.5.2. The process, of
> course, required the use of a great deal of entries in the
> package.keywords file to get around the fact that KDE is not in stable
> yet. I was able to write a sim
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 02:58:00PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:13, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > There is any provision for binary dependency on Gentoo/Portage? The
> > way it works now is quite messy with things like revdep-rebuild.
>
> Solving
> To make this things worse, the above example assumes that within a slot,
> the libraries are binary compatible. There are examples of libraries that
> are not. And what about a library whose interface is dependent on a third
> library: B uses A, C uses B, but B exports A. So B is dependent on A,
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:13, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There is any provision for binary dependency on Gentoo/Portage? The
> way it works now is quite messy with things like revdep-rebuild.
>
> I have an idea to "solve" this problem: after software is build, you
> check whic
Brian told that portage already has sqlite support.
Where i can find it or how i can turn it on? Is there any bugs or
other reasons to not use it? I would like to support it's code as this
is nr. 1 priority for me right now :)
--
tvali
(e-mail: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; msn: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]";
icq:
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Simon Stelling wrote:
> Pingveno wrote:
> >kde-base/* ~x86
> >
> >or, to apply it to a single version, this:
> >
> >=kde-base/*-3.5.1 ~x86
> >
> >Regular expressions would, of course, work too. They might be a little
> >bit of overkill, though.
>
> Bug 571
Pingveno wrote:
kde-base/* ~x86
or, to apply it to a single version, this:
=kde-base/*-3.5.1 ~x86
Regular expressions would, of course, work too. They might be a little
bit of overkill, though.
Bug 57153, was RESOLVED LATER
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57153
--
Kind Regards,
Sim
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:06:12AM +0200, tvali wrote:
> Just in case ...what i have to do to test those resultse
Command line invocation is listed above the test results;
python -m timeit -s 's="asdf"*400;s+="fdsa.ebuild"' 's.endswith(".ebuild")'
fex (for example).
> ...ps. should i send it here
Just in case ...what i have to do to test those results
...ps. should i send it here if i have a working c++ class for forking
-- it evolved from that python thought here, which evolved into
general interest to those pipes and interacting with other apps in my
case (which is, as i have understood
11 matches
Mail list logo
