Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Manifest2 reloaded

2006-03-16 Thread tvali
Just in case ...what i have to do to test those results ...ps. should i send it here if i have a working c++ class for forking -- it evolved from that python thought here, which evolved into general interest to those pipes and interacting with other apps in my case (which is, as i have

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Wildcards in package.keywords

2006-03-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 11:57:06AM +0100, Simon Stelling wrote: Pingveno wrote: kde-base/* ~x86 or, to apply it to a single version, this: =kde-base/*-3.5.1 ~x86 Regular expressions would, of course, work too. They might be a little bit of overkill, though. Bug 57153, was RESOLVED

[gentoo-portage-dev] Portage sqlite support

2006-03-16 Thread tvali
Brian told that portage already has sqlite support. Where i can find it or how i can turn it on? Is there any bugs or other reasons to not use it? I would like to support it's code as this is nr. 1 priority for me right now :) -- tvali (e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; msn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; icq:

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DB and binary dependency

2006-03-16 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:13, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: Hello, There is any provision for binary dependency on Gentoo/Portage? The way it works now is quite messy with things like revdep-rebuild. I have an idea to solve this problem: after software is build, you check which files

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DB and binary dependency

2006-03-16 Thread tvali
To make this things worse, the above example assumes that within a slot, the libraries are binary compatible. There are examples of libraries that are not. And what about a library whose interface is dependent on a third library: B uses A, C uses B, but B exports A. So B is dependent on A, and

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DB and binary dependency

2006-03-16 Thread Brian Harring
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 02:58:00PM +0100, Paul de Vrieze wrote: On Wednesday 15 March 2006 16:13, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote: Hello, There is any provision for binary dependency on Gentoo/Portage? The way it works now is quite messy with things like revdep-rebuild. Solving this is

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DB and binary dependency

2006-03-16 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Thursday 16 March 2006 15:18, tvali wrote: To make this things worse, the above example assumes that within a slot, the libraries are binary compatible. There are examples of libraries that are not. And what about a library whose interface is dependent on a third library: B uses A, C

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] DB and binary dependency

2006-03-16 Thread Paul de Vrieze
On Thursday 16 March 2006 15:24, Brian Harring wrote: I would have called bincompat BINSLOT, but the idea is the same. As per the norm, requires a smart resolver; for c++ would expect cycles to occur where the only solution is to pull in libstdc++ (fex) to sidestep horkage while doing the