Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] few licences, which should exist

2006-03-30 Thread Patrick Lauer
tvali, This does not have anything to do with portage development. While I appreciate your concerns and ideas I must ask you to stop abusing this mailinglist. Things like this off-topic email and the thread where you replied four times to yourself are not good form and should be avoided (unless yo

[gentoo-portage-dev] few licences, which should exist

2006-03-30 Thread tvali
(portage list is maybe the best place to send this, but still, maybe usable as i dont know lists with such specific purpose -- so sending it to gentoo list and gnu) I have thought about such things: 1. Formats like mp3 are put together in such way that basically noone can use them with a free app

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] tree dependency check

2006-03-30 Thread Jason Stubbs
On Thursday 30 March 2006 11:40, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Thu, 30 Mar 2006 08:30:17 +0900 > Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thursday 30 March 2006 01:21, Marius Mauch wrote: > > > Marius Mauch schrieb: > > > > So after manifest2 is in, I'll revive the other issue that IMO is > > >

[gentoo-portage-dev] Hello (Re: test)

2006-03-30 Thread Duncan
genone posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Thu, 30 Mar 2006 04:15:48 +0200: > Test This seems a good opportunity for my own test... and introduction. Some weeks ago I mailed a couple of you asking if my presence here would be worthwhile and not disruptive (last thing I want to do is