Simon Stelling wrote:
Hey all,
I'm just wading through a list of ~200 bugs of which some need decisions
what
should be done, whether it should be done at all or simply whether it is
a bug
or not.
Bug: SRC_URI: spaces not supported
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102607
Is this a 'NOTABUG' case?
Need to check the SRC_URI documentation, if it's noted there, then close
it, if its not noted in the docs, add that spaces are not allowed and
close it ;)
Bug: gpg: strict incorrectly takes priority over severe
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68906
What's the expected behaviour? Is it NOTABUG?
Bug: Method to monitor a package without installing/upgrading it
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47456
Same thing. Do we want this?
Alternative tool.
Bug: Support for a pre-compile pkg_config
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99529
As Jason mentioned: Is this worth the effort?
Effort is minimal, but I'm unsure of the real usefulness.
Bug: per profile package.keywords
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55321
Voting seems to be a bit... incomplete ;)
This is down to a design issue. package.keywords is a repository
control measure, do we currently allow profiles to mess with repos?
Only via use.mask at present. profile mangling of a repository is
difficult when multiple repositories are brought in because we really
don't have any type of repo binding in the current source. I personally
think it's an important feature, but it's difficult to not implement it
in a half assed manner.
Bug: Wording These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112439
This needs a decision too. What wording do we prefer? Either way, the
bug should
be closed, the fix is trivial in case we want to change it.
Ummm someone just make a decision, I don't think it's that big a deal.
Bug: global exception handling
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28535
Should tracebacks be thrown in the users' face or not?
Yes, Not saying you shouldn't write code that catches exceptions and all
that but writing stupid code that catches any exception and then tries
to print some useful info is...not as useful. I'd prefer to have
documented a bit more what functions throw ( docstrings )? so that when
users use portage functionality they know what to catch.
Bug: /usr/lib/portage/bin/clean_locks documentation example could make
use use
DISTDIR
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116676
Call portageq or not? Voting time ;)
nfc :0
That should be enough for the moment. More will probably follow,
considering
that I only checked the first 60 bugs or so :/ It would be nice if we
could make
the needed decision and then close the bugs where it is
NOTABUG/INVALID/LATER. I
hate stale bug listings ;)
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
