Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-04-30 Thread Donnie Berkholz
m h wrote: OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro, can you suggest a good way of creating a series of patches that apply on top of each other? (I'd like to do it the "right" way) I suggest dev-util/quilt -- if you like GUIs, try dev-util/gquilt. Thanks, Donnie -- gentoo-portage-dev@g

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-04-30 Thread m h
OK will do that. Since, I'm not a patching pro, can you suggest a good way of creating a series of patches that apply on top of each other? (I'd like to do it the "right" way) Also, what codeline should I be working off? On 4/30/06, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'm more concerned wi

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf

2006-04-30 Thread Simon Stelling
I'm all for it. How about 'virtual/config-manager'? -- Kind Regards, Simon Stelling Gentoo/AMD64 Developer -- gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-portage-dev] Breakout etc-update, dispatch-conf

2006-04-30 Thread Alec Warner
A bunch of bugs have been fixed with both of these lately, anyone against splitting them out, please speak up now, otherwise I will split them out later this week and portage will depend on some nasty virtual whose name I have not come up with yet ( new style virtual ). -Antarus -- gentoo-portage

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-04-30 Thread Alec Warner
I'm more concerned with the revamp of Global vars in one commit, and then the re-arrangement in the other. m h wrote: > Yes, I can break it up, but it will probably be 3 one line changes and > one big 1000 line change. The 1000 line change is pretty > straightforward. The only real code changes