Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Stablizing portage 2.1

2006-05-02 Thread Simon Stelling
Zac Medico wrote: Well, it's been the tree for 2 days now we'll surely get bug reports as soon as people run into these hypothetical issues (though I expect very few, if any regressions). I think the globals cleanup is worth having in 2.1 because it makes the code more maintainable. Ack.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Refactoring of emerge code

2006-05-02 Thread m h
Here's a stab at pre10... The order of application is the order of explanation: globals.diff - remove most globals main_emerge.diff - add __main__ section emergelint.diff - remove some obvious lint issues (unused/non-existent vars) emergepychecker.diff - remove unused (and repeated) imports

[gentoo-portage-dev] feature freeze for 2.1

2006-05-02 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi everyone, The 2006.1 release is scheduled for this coming August and there are a lot of people counting on portage-2.1 being stable in time for that release. In order to ensure that this happens, we need to stop the addition of new features.