On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 18:02:19 -0700
"Dan Corson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am sorry, you are indeed correct. What I should have requested is:
> a way to have the package list output in non-interactive,
> package-installing (that is, not --pretend) execution. It may be
> that --pretend is a l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Corson wrote:
> I am sorry, you are indeed correct. What I should have requested is: a
> way to have the package list output in non-interactive,
> package-installing (that is, not --pretend) execution.
Sure, that's easy. I know of at least one p
Dan Corson wrote:
I am sorry, you are indeed correct. What I should have requested is: a
way to have the package list output in non-interactive,
package-installing (that is, not --pretend) execution. It may be that
--pretend is a little over-loaded currently. (I was confused, at any
rate, a
On 6/24/06, Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Corson wrote:> Even when I am running 'emerge' non-interactively, I like to have the> dependency record afforded by --tree. Currently when updating my system> non-interactively to get this I have to do:
> (emerge -uDtv world; emerge -uDv
Dan Corson wrote:
Even when I am running 'emerge' non-interactively, I like to have the
dependency record afforded by --tree. Currently when updating my system
non-interactively to get this I have to do:
(emerge -uDtv world; emerge -uDv world) &> logfile
because --tree implies --pretend. Co
Even when I am running 'emerge' non-interactively, I like to have the dependency record afforded by --tree. Currently when updating my system non-interactively to get this I have to do: (emerge -uDtv world; emerge -uDv world) &> logfile
because --tree implies --pretend. Could this implication be