Resending to portage dev ml to solicit comments...
Thoughts welcome, since it's an issue that must be dealt with to
sanely do efficient parallelization (monkeying with make.conf and
hardcoding vals isn't much of a solution).
Zac- comments? You seem to have totally missed the original email ;)
On Tue, Oct 10, 2006 at 03:20:55AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Brian Harring wrote:
I might be daft (likely), but why not just introduce a var indicating
max parallelization instead? Tweak portage to push that setting into
MAKEOPTS=${MAKEOPTS+${MAKEOPTS} } -j${PARALLELIZATION}.
The idea
On Tue, 10 Oct 2006 00:04:57 -0700
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might be daft (likely), but why not just introduce a var indicating
max parallelization instead? Tweak portage to push that setting into
MAKEOPTS=${MAKEOPTS+${MAKEOPTS} } -j${PARALLELIZATION}.
Might sound daft,
