On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:27:42PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Brian Harring wrote:
> I'm not inserting cross into a package's keywords. I'm saying that perl
> ebuilds (for example) should have in their KEYWORDS "-cross" to indicate
> that they don't work with the "cross"
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> >
> > I wouldn't change ACCEPT_KEYWORDS at all or anything in the computation of
> > pgroups or mygroups in portdbapi.gvisible(), so package.keywords is
> > unchanged and the whole inc
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:36PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Brian Harring wrote:
>
> > What is annoying there is that since package.keywords is under
> > *very* weird rules, you can't do the usual incremental tricks there.
> >
> > Try specifying that you want to run
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Brian Harring wrote:
> What is annoying there is that since package.keywords is under
> *very* weird rules, you can't do the usual incremental tricks there.
>
> Try specifying that you want to run only stable arch via
> package.keywords sometime; it's not possible.
In an
On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 01:45:34PM -0500, Daniel Barkalow wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Marius Mauch wrote:
>
> > No. -foo is reserved for incremental negation. Maybe that isn't widely
> > used in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, but it has valid uses there and there can't be
> > repurposed.
>
> Oh, so -foo in
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Marius Mauch wrote:
> No. -foo is reserved for incremental negation. Maybe that isn't widely
> used in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS, but it has valid uses there and there can't be
> repurposed.
Oh, so -foo in package.keywords is used to override foo in
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS? That makes sense
On Wed, 22 Nov 2006 03:10:45 -0500 (EST)
Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are packages (such as perl) which work fine on both x86 and arm,
> but don't build on x86 cross-compiling for arm. Furthermore, pam-0.78 can
> be cross-compiled (with a patch available in bug comments), b
There are packages (such as perl) which work fine on both x86 and arm,
but don't build on x86 cross-compiling for arm. Furthermore, pam-0.78 can
be cross-compiled (with a patch available in bug comments), but pam-0.99
will require more work to get to cross-compile. It would be useful to be
able
