On Thursday 01 November 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> >> The immediate motivation of my examining this code was a request on
> >> #gentoo-dev-help by lack for something which I could with my new code
>
On Thursday 01 November 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> Zlin found yet another bug. Since echo "" will output a newline my current
> proposed implementation of useq won't be quiet.
sounds like we should have a testsuite in portage to make sure the misc
variants are operating as expected
-m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
Zlin found yet another bug. Since echo "" will output a newline my current
proposed implementation of useq won't be quiet.
> _use() {
> local flag=$1
> local string_success=$2
> local string_failure=$3
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> In gambit I used:
>
> econf $(if use static; then echo --disable-shared; else echo --enable-shared;
> fi) \
>
> could become:
>
> econf $(_use static --disable-shared --enable-shared) \
as zlin rightly pointed out o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 October 2007, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
>> I hope this is just an artifact of the patch being a bit opaque. The
>> inconsistent indentation in the patch is a consequence of emacs bash mode
>> using a differe
