Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 04 November 2007, Zac Medico wrote: >> For the USE=arch_${ARCH} part, we only have to add ARCH to >> USE_EXPAND in the base profile. For generating the implicit IUSE, we >> can introduce a new profile variable (rather

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Zac Medico wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Sunday 04 November 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > >> Zac Medico wrote: > >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: > userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are "magical" and > arent available for user consumption. t

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Sunday 04 November 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: >> Zac Medico wrote: >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> Mike Frysinger wrote: userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are "magical" an

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: More general interface to use flags

2007-11-04 Thread Alec Warner
On 11/4/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > > the current interface to use flags, useq, usev, use_with, use_enable, as > > defined in /usr/lib/portage/bin/ebuild.sh lacks generality. The common > > thing is testing a use flag and possibly echoing a string, b

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Andrew Gaffney wrote: > Zac Medico wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Mike Frysinger wrote: > >> userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are "magical" and > >> arent available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Zac Medico wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are "magical" and arent available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE. it was my understanding that portage was going to get fixed to automatica

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Frysinger wrote: > userland_* and all other profile-expanded USE flags are "magical" and arent > available for user consumption. that is how i view IUSE. it was my > understanding that portage was going to get fixed to automatically include >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 04 November 2007, Zac Medico wrote: > Fabian Groffen wrote: > > Just to have it clear and to be sure: > > > > On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild > >> Log: > >> do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE > >> (Portage version: 2.1

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fabian Groffen wrote: > Just to have it clear and to be sure: > > On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild >> Log: >> do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE >> (Portage version: 2.1.3.16) >> >> >

[gentoo-portage-dev] IUSE and userland_, elibc_, kernel_, etc.

2007-11-04 Thread Fabian Groffen
Just to have it clear and to be sure: On 04-11-2007 03:33:41 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Modified: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild > Log: > do *not* include userland_GNU in IUSE > (Portage version: 2.1.3.16) > > > Index: diffutils-2.8.7-r2.ebuild > -IUSE="nls static userland_GNU" > +IUSE="n