On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 20:04 +0200, Arthur D. wrote:
> > I am very much against allowing EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in revdep-rebuild
> > since I went through hell trying to support it when it was first added
> > as a feature to portage and I really don't want to go through that
> > again.
>
> Paul, there
On Mon, 2009-10-26 at 11:01 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:54:35PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> > I am very much against allowing EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in revdep-rebuild
> > since I went through hell trying to support it when it was first added
> > as a feature to portage and
I am very much against allowing EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in revdep-rebuild
since I went through hell trying to support it when it was first added
as a feature to portage and I really don't want to go through that
again.
Paul, there's good option to filter _only_ safe options from
EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPT
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:54:35PM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
> I am very much against allowing EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS in revdep-rebuild
> since I went through hell trying to support it when it was first added
> as a feature to portage and I really don't want to go through that
> again.
Just out of cu
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 22:23 +0300, Arthur D. wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Just press ctrl-c and enjoy scrolling. Then run again. No too user
> friendly.
> You don't like that behaviour? Just add the desired options to command like
> parameters. You don't like adding options explicitly? Hey, that
