On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 22:16 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:32:34PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
In order to support alternative compression types for binhost
packages, I was thinking about adding support for a header field in
the Packages index file. For
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 1:01 PM, Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 22:16 -0700, Brian Harring wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 08:32:34PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
Hi,
In order to support alternative compression types for binhost
packages, I was thinking about
On 06/01/2010 02:22 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
As for zacs tool to try and generate new views of a repository via
hardlinking/recreating the tree... frankly it's a bit of a hack. Via
DEFAULT_URI and relying on the hash, you can make a stable repository that
is able to be updated in place
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 06/01/2010 02:22 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
As for zacs tool to try and generate new views of a repository via
hardlinking/recreating the tree... frankly it's a bit of a hack. Via
DEFAULT_URI and relying on the hash,
On 06/01/2010 02:52 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
That bug isn't about a collision, it's about files being replaced underneath
Packages feet. Even with the tricks you've leveled the issue of things
changing under foot still is possible- you've just made the race less
likely.
AFAIK the race is
On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 04:53:31PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 06/01/2010 02:52 PM, Brian Harring wrote:
That bug isn't about a collision, it's about files being replaced underneath
Packages feet. Even with the tricks you've leveled the issue of things
changing under foot still is
