Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 18:38 +0100, René Neumann wrote: > Am 03.12.2013 17:05, schrieb Mike Frysinger: > > as for the patch, i'm of the opinion that make.conf is not for > > documenting random USE_EXPAND-ed variables. > > > > this sort of thing should go into the relevant eclass, > > python-r1.ecla

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 11:52:47 Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:05:51AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > as for the patch, i'm of the opinion that make.conf is not for > > documenting random USE_EXPAND-ed variables. > > ... > > > there is the matter of visibility ... we

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread René Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 03.12.2013 17:05, schrieb Mike Frysinger: > as for the patch, i'm of the opinion that make.conf is not for > documenting random USE_EXPAND-ed variables. > > this sort of thing should go into the relevant eclass, > python-r1.eclass in this case. th

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Dec 03, 2013 at 11:05:51AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: > as for the patch, i'm of the opinion that make.conf is not for documenting > random USE_EXPAND-ed variables. ... > there is the matter of visibility ... we could add a generic pointer to the > make.conf man page discussing that the

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 December 2013 04:19:27 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Using git send-email since vapier told me to. I haven't used this before, > so sorry if I have done something wrong. Please let me know. looks ok from `git send-email` pov, but random comments not meant for the commit message should

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Tue, 2013-12-03 at 11:43 +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 03/12/13 11:21, Sebastian Luther wrote: > > The problem with all these variables is that we don't maintain > > them. If they disappear, change meaning or new ones are added we > > constantly have to fix our documentation. > I don't t

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Portage's documentation is inappropriate place for this. Please do not commit this patch. -- Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Duncan
Alexander Berntsen posted on Tue, 03 Dec 2013 11:43:42 +0100 as excerpted: > On 03/12/13 11:21, Sebastian Luther wrote: >> The problem with all these variables is that we don't maintain them. If >> they disappear, change meaning or new ones are added we constantly have >> to fix our documentation.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/12/13 11:21, Sebastian Luther wrote: > The problem with all these variables is that we don't maintain > them. If they disappear, change meaning or new ones are added we > constantly have to fix our documentation. I don't think this is a problem

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Sebastian Luther
Am 03.12.2013 11:08, schrieb Alexander Berntsen: > On 03/12/13 10:46, Sebastian Luther wrote: >> Should we really document specific USE_EXPAND variables? What >> about all the others? > I think so, yes. > [...] > I can do this over the weekend. > The problem with all these variables is that we

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 03/12/13 10:46, Sebastian Luther wrote: > Should we really document specific USE_EXPAND variables? What > about all the others? I think so, yes. > USE_EXPAND="ABI_MIPS ABI_X86 ALSA_CARDS APACHE2_MODULES > APACHE2_MPMS CALLIGRA_FEATURES CAMERAS CO

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Sebastian Luther
Should we really document specific USE_EXPAND variables? What about all the others? USE_EXPAND="ABI_MIPS ABI_X86 ALSA_CARDS APACHE2_MODULES APACHE2_MPMS CALLIGRA_FEATURES CAMERAS COLLECTD_PLUGINS CROSSCOMPILE_OPTS CURL_SSL DRACUT_MODULES DVB_CARDS ELIBC ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES FCDSL_CARDS FFTOOLS FO

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Apparently I forgot to turn off the option that CCs the author, and consequently managed to do what I have been telling you to not do. Don't take this as an invitation to CC me after all. ;-) - -- Alexander alexan...@plaimi.net http://plaimi.net/~a

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] make.conf.5: Document PYTHON_TARGETS, bug #493180

2013-12-03 Thread Alexander Berntsen
Using git send-email since vapier told me to. I haven't used this before, so sorry if I have done something wrong. Please let me know. --- man/make.conf.5 | 15 ++- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/make.conf.5 b/man/make.conf.5 index c271d17..db198f9 10