On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 08:43:12 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 04:02:02PM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
I think the idea is that you shouldn't need to refer to an external
resource like the mailing list to understand the idea behind the
patch,
Either someone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 18/01/14 22:52, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
You mean like... https://github.com/gentoo/portage
This didn't exist back when. I should have done more research though.
Thanks.
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
---
man/emerge.1| 9 +
pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/man/emerge.1 b/man/emerge.1
index e23d1b4..52f8ed7 100644
--- a/man/emerge.1
+++ b/man/emerge.1
@@ -331,10 +331,11 @@ Write required unmask changes to the
Rename --autounmask-write to --autounmask. Please note that removing the
option does not mean that the variable used for keeping track of
autounmask writing is not removed from depgraph.py.
---
man/emerge.1| 19 +++
pym/_emerge/depgraph.py | 4 ++--
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:24:59 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
If it doesn't need to get updated, then it probably already started
out explaining the consensus ;).
That is a guess, you can look this up in past patches.
You spend time if you want to spend time and add whoever you
v2: Reformat, add a function to return an appropriate read-only checker
for the operating system, so that this can be extended to other OSes.
v3: minor formatting tweaks from bernalex, including use os.path.join()
instead of string concatenation
---
pym/portage/dbapi/vartree.py | 32
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Alexander Berntsen
alexan...@plaimi.net wrote:
Rename --autounmask-write to --autounmask. Please note that removing the
option does not mean that the variable used for keeping track of
autounmask writing is not removed from depgraph.py.
Ok, so how do I tell
The current fetch() function is quite long, which makes it hard to
know what I can change without adverse side effects. By pulling this
logic out of the main function, we get clearer logic in fetch() and
more explicit input for the config extraction.
---
pym/portage/package/ebuild/fetch.py | 50
I felt like I should actually make a useful contribution to balance
the less useful commit-message discussion ;). Browsing through the
open Portage bugs, #175612 looked interesting. After I looked at
pym/portage/package/ebuild/fetch.py, I decided to take a step back and
just try and refactor
The current fetch() function is quite long, which makes it hard to
know what I can change without adverse side effects. By pulling this
logic out of the main function, we get clearer logic in fetch() and
more explicit input for the config extraction.
This block was especially complicated, so I
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 02:33:06AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 15:24:59 -0800
W. Trevor King wk...@tremily.us wrote:
If it doesn't need to get updated, then it probably already
started out explaining the consensus ;).
That is a guess, you can look this up in past
11 matches
Mail list logo
