Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add a test case for PMS-compliant usage of the ROOT variable.

On 05/11/2016 12:33 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > > I'll work on adding this check to repoman after I finish getting some > in progress changes done so the new repoman code can be released. > I took a look at the new code and it was really easy to get something working. I added a new QA category,

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add a test case for PMS-compliant usage of the ROOT variable.

On Wed, 11 May 2016 12:27:10 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Michael Orlitzky > wrote: > > A recent thread on gentoo-dev proposed a change to the devmanual's > > description of the ROOT variable: > > > >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Add a test case for PMS-compliant usage of the ROOT variable.

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > A recent thread on gentoo-dev proposed a change to the devmanual's > description of the ROOT variable: > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/8901669dd375ca0fdb610efef0ddfe6f > > The proposed change would

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 0/1] Test PMS-compliant usage of the ROOT variable.

Per the discussion over on -dev, this adds a test case for usage of the ROOT variable outside of the PMS-defined pkg_* functions (which is not allowed). There should probably be a warning for this in repoman, since most usages I've seen are really intended to be EPREFIX and not ROOT. Any cases