On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 17:25 +, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 16/01/19 12:59, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:20 +, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> >> On 16/01/19 11:58, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> >>> How come portage isn't in shadow, only in passwd ?
> >>> Seems wrong to me.
> >>>
>
On 16/01/19 12:59, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:20 +, M. J. Everitt wrote:
>> On 16/01/19 11:58, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
>>> How come portage isn't in shadow, only in passwd ?
>>> Seems wrong to me.
>>>
>>> Jocke
>> Because the portage user never logs on .. hence has no p
On Wed, 2019-01-16 at 12:20 +, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 16/01/19 11:58, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> > How come portage isn't in shadow, only in passwd ?
> > Seems wrong to me.
> >
> > Jocke
> Because the portage user never logs on .. hence has no password. That said,
That goes for evry other s
On 16/01/19 11:58, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> How come portage isn't in shadow, only in passwd ?
> Seems wrong to me.
>
> Jocke
Because the portage user never logs on .. hence has no password. That said,
it does seem an odd situation, since even users with no password do tend to
appear in /etc/shad
How come portage isn't in shadow, only in passwd ?
Seems wrong to me.
Jocke