Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH gentoolkit 1/2] eclean: Rewrite findPackages()

2020-02-20 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 21/02/20 05:29, Matt Turner wrote: > I found the original code to be nearly incomprehensible. Instead of > populating a dict of potential binpkgs to remove and then removing from > the to-be-removed list, just selectively add to-be-removed packages. > > Signed-off-by: Matt Turner > --- > I

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add QA check for unresolved soname dependencies (bug 704320)

2020-01-05 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 06/01/20 06:38, Zac Medico wrote: > Example output for maven-bin-3.6.2 (bug 704618): > > * QA Notice: Unresolved soname dependencies: > * > */usr/share/maven-bin-3.6/lib/jansi-native/freebsd32/libjansi.so: > libc.so.7 libutil.so.9 > *

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH gentoolkit 1/2] eclean: Fix typos

2020-01-02 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 02/01/20 18:57, Matt Turner wrote: > Signed-off-by: Matt Turner > --- > pym/gentoolkit/eclean/cli.py| 4 ++-- > pym/gentoolkit/eclean/search.py | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/pym/gentoolkit/eclean/cli.py b/pym/gentoolkit/eclean/cli.py > index

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Build path abi missing in qemu-user

2019-12-18 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 18/12/19 17:36, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > On Wed, 2019-12-18 at 11:22 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not >> click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the >> content is safe. >> >> >> On Thu, Dec

[gentoo-portage-dev] RFC: [QA] notice with 'failed' seds [was PATCH: eapply drop -s option]

2019-12-13 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 13/12/19 20:36, Michał Górny wrote [excerpted]: > > Is this really an argument for or *against* it? Developers are entirely > capable of keeping seds that do nothing for years, as well as patches > that -- while apparently applying correctly -- are entirely meaningless. I think there is some

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-12-13 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 13/12/19 21:59, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 21:56 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >> On 13/12/19 21:42, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-12-13 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 13/12/19 21:42, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 16:37 -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 3:36 PM Michał Górny wrote: >>> Just like 'many of the proposals lately', developers are going to be >>> the ones disabling it (because they don't care), and users will be

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: seed emerge with old /var/db/pkg ?

2019-11-13 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 13/11/19 19:07, Zac Medico wrote: > On 11/8/19 9:09 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 01:57 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >>> I am looking for a way to seed emerge with an older pkg db so emerge can >>> calculate >>> which packages needs to be rebuild/upgraded in order to

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] install-qa-check.d: remove check that bans libtool files and static libs from /

2019-11-03 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 03/11/19 21:37, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-03 at 15:26 -0600, William Hubbs wrote: >> >> You being a qa member doesn't have a lot to do with this mgorny. you >> know there was no official policy when I posted this, and as far as I >> know there is not one now. >> > That is a really