[gentoo-portage-dev] Portage color.map settings

2009-08-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
Hi! Given the following portage output: troy ~ # USE=examples emerge -pv python --- Invalid atom in /usr/portage/local/layman/dev-zero/profiles/package.mask: =dev-libs/boost-log-scm These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R ]

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Portage color.map settings

2009-08-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:05:05 -0700 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: With =portage-2.2_rc34, this patch is included: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=274279 With that you can do things like yellow=darkblue and green=darkgreen. Thanks a lot, this works great. Philipp

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Masked by corruption

2007-01-11 Thread Philipp Riegger
On 02.01.2007, at 06:56, Zac Medico wrote: In =portage-2.1.2_rc4-r2 t does that now for installed package (see bug #158931). For /var/cache/edb/dep the sqlite module is available (requires pysqlite or python-2.5 with sqlite support enabled). Where can i find documentation about this? I use

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Portage phase hooks patch

2006-07-26 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Jul 25, 2006, at 9:30 AM, Kevin F. Quinn wrote: If the main issue is cleaning up after an abort, perhaps it would be useful to add a pkg_abort() phase to the package manager; then that can be implemented in an eclass. But i think this could be a problem when FEATURES=keepwork or

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-19 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 15, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Duncan wrote: But i really think this is not about helping but about confusion. If i post my emerge --info you don't know if i really use confcache even if i have FEATURES=confcache, because emerge --info does not say if i have emerged confcache and, if i have

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-15 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 15, 2006, at 8:40 AM, Duncan wrote: Wouldn't the help them out default be consistent with the non-interactive goal for portage? Quit if there's no sane way to go forward without potentially breaking a system, but otherwise, use sane fallbacks where they are possible. I don't think

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] 2.1 release candidate soon?

2006-04-14 Thread Philipp Riegger
On Apr 7, 2006, at 5:26 PM, Alec Warner wrote: We have a new cache format, confcache, parallel fetch, etc... The bonus is these features are already mature and relatively old ( a year + as of now ). Reading about confcache i have one question: When i saw, that this feature exists (in