-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 04/07/16 20:00, Zac Medico wrote:
> I wasn't aware that there was an argument about that.
I didn't argue it very heavily, but I do find it useful.
> I'll be happy to send pushed emails.
Thanks!
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
On 07/04/2016 05:17 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Never mind. I see that it's already pushed. I guess this is where I
> continue to argue my case for "Pushed as [commit hash]" emails.
I wasn't aware that there was an argument about that. I'll be happy to
send pushed emails.
--
Thanks,
Zac
On 07/04/2016 05:16 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> Looks OK. But you've found a few bugs already. Maybe you'll find more.
> I'd appreciate if you hold off until the end of the week before
> pushing it confidently.
I'm extremely confident in v2 of the patch. I don't expect that we'll
find any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Never mind. I see that it's already pushed. I guess this is where I
continue to argue my case for "Pushed as [commit hash]" emails.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 22:40:47 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> > On 07/01/2016 12:37 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> >> @@ -327,6 +341,11 @@ def action_build(settings, trees, mtimedb,
> >>display_missing_pkg_set(root_config,
>
On 07/01/2016 03:46 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 12:37 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
>> @@ -327,6 +341,11 @@ def action_build(settings, trees, mtimedb,
>> display_missing_pkg_set(root_config, e.value)
>> return 1
>>
>> +if success and
On Fri, 1 Jul 2016 10:17:50 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 07/01/2016 09:42 AM, Duncan wrote:
> > Zac Medico posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:35:26 -0700 as excerpted:
> >
> >>> But if you genuinely think this is a good idea, and someone else
> >>> on the team does too, I won't
On 07/01/2016 12:37 AM, Zac Medico wrote:
> @@ -327,6 +341,11 @@ def action_build(settings, trees, mtimedb,
> display_missing_pkg_set(root_config, e.value)
> return 1
>
> + if success and mydepgraph.need_config_reload():
> +
On 07/01/2016 09:42 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Zac Medico posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:35:26 -0700 as excerpted:
>
>>> But if you genuinely think this is a good idea, and someone else on the
>>> team does too, I won't oppose it. We should make sure that we strongly
>>> discourage its usage for regular
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/07/16 18:42, Duncan wrote:
> Perhaps rename the option so it makes perfectly clear the possible
> consequences? Something like --autounmask-breakme, or
> --auto-breakme ?
No.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
Zac Medico posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2016 08:35:26 -0700 as excerpted:
>> But if you genuinely think this is a good idea, and someone else on the
>> team does too, I won't oppose it. We should make sure that we strongly
>> discourage its usage for regular users. Perhaps your suggested manpage
>>
11 matches
Mail list logo