On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 4:05 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) schrieb:
Why is a custom set less convenient?
Well, instead of emerge --trialware package you would first have to edit
your
@trialware set and then emerge @trialware. The same goes for when you want
to
remove some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why exactly would you want to use --oneshot for a leaf package that is
not depended on by
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 4:21 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan wrote:
Patrick Börjesson psychoti...@lavabit.com posted
20090529201741.gb11...@nexon.nexus, excerpted below, on Fri, 29 May 2009
22:17:41 +0200:
Why
