On Monday 28 November 2005 00:20, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Monday 28 November 2005 00:01, Ned Ludd wrote:
The following untested attached patch removes CDEPEND from ebuild.sh
A quick grep -i shows that there is one case of CDEPEND left in
pym/portage.py after applying the patch. It's in the auxdbkeys around
line 5130. Not sure if that is safe to remove or not.
The cache entry for CDEP has been replaced with a blank line to keep
the cache format compatible.
The CDEPEND in auxdbkeys is needed, but it won't cause any harm other
than the extra 10 or 11 bytes added to portage.py. This patch is pretty
much perfect as it is. :)
Great.
So it's all in your hands now then I can assume and I don't need to file
a bug? ;-)
Committed.
Anything else pending before .53 hits stable?
I don't believe so. I'll give it until Wednesday 12:00 UTC and put it out then
if nothing comes up. I don't expect anything to, but I'm having a couple of
whiskeys atm before bed and will be heading out to a drinking establishment
tomorrow... ;)
You know I can be somewhat impatient and I'm ready to get started on
making patches for .54
As are we all. However, the wait seems to be doing good. While trunk is has
been reopened for a while, the only things that have gone in have been in
testing outside of trunk for a while which has improved quality greatly.
Given people's expectations of what 2.0.54 should be I'm not sure of what will
happen with 2.1/2.2. However, given the quality that trunk currently has it
might be best to split off a branch and lock down the changes in 2.0.54 as
soon as the first _pre is released. As far as I know, everything I listed in
my last email to the .53, .54.. thread have existing tested patches so we
can probably get a 2.0.54 up to where 2.0.53 is now in half the time...
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
