On 08/13/2017 05:23 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 14/08/17 01:19, Zac Medico wrote [excerpted]:
>> You'll get the same result as --autounmask-use-only if you use
>> --autounmask-keep-keywords together with --autounmask-keep-masks.
>>
>> This way, we can also add --autounmask-keep-license and
>>
On 14/08/17 01:19, Zac Medico wrote [excerpted]:
> You'll get the same result as --autounmask-use-only if you use
> --autounmask-keep-keywords together with --autounmask-keep-masks.
>
> This way, we can also add --autounmask-keep-license and
> --autounmask-keep-use options if we want, and the
On 08/13/2017 04:37 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 12/08/17 19:08, Zac Medico wrote:
>> The option prevents --autounmask from making changes to
>> package.accept_keywords. This option does not imply
>> --autounmask-keep-masks, so --autounmask is still allowed
>> to create package.unmask changes
On 12/08/17 19:08, Zac Medico wrote:
> The option prevents --autounmask from making changes to
> package.accept_keywords. This option does not imply
> --autounmask-keep-masks, so --autounmask is still allowed
> to create package.unmask changes unless the
> --autounmask-keep-masks is also
The option prevents --autounmask from making changes to
package.accept_keywords. This option does not imply
--autounmask-keep-masks, so --autounmask is still allowed
to create package.unmask changes unless the
--autounmask-keep-masks is also specified.
X-Gentoo-bug: 622480
X-Gentoo-bug-url:
