Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 04 Jan 2016 19:17, Brian Dolbec wrote: > I immediately want to say REJECT!, REJECT!, REJECT!,... > ... > I would much prefer you re-base your patch on the rewrite code. reject != delay ... i don't mind waiting and rebasing -mike signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-05 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 19:17:41 -0800 Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:30:30 -0500 > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > Some packages list the same atom multiple times (e.g. behind diff > > USE flags). If one of them throws an error, we end up listing it

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-04 Thread Mike Frysinger
Some packages list the same atom multiple times (e.g. behind diff USE flags). If one of them throws an error, we end up listing it more than once, and the output can get verbose/useless. --- pym/repoman/scanner.py | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-04 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 16:30:30 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: > Some packages list the same atom multiple times (e.g. behind diff USE > flags). If one of them throws an error, we end up listing it more > than once, and the output can get verbose/useless. > --- >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: filter out duplicate dependencies in error messages

2016-01-04 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/04/2016 01:30 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > + # Filter out > duplicates. We do this by hand (rather > + # than use a > set) so the order is stable and better > +