Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix atom.blocker checks.

2014-08-11 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-08-04, o godz. 11:02:27 Michał Górny napisał(a): > The original checks assume that no-blocker is denoted as 'None'. > However, currently atom.blocker returns just 'False'. This one got into git a while ago, and it'll go live in the next release. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signat

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix atom.blocker checks.

2014-08-06 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 23:51:00 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 2014-08-04, o godz. 11:02:27 > Michał Górny napisał(a): > > > The original checks assume that no-blocker is denoted as 'None'. > > However, currently atom.blocker returns just 'False'. > > So, applying this patch restores the 'depend

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix atom.blocker checks.

2014-08-04 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-08-04, o godz. 11:02:27 Michał Górny napisał(a): > The original checks assume that no-blocker is denoted as 'None'. > However, currently atom.blocker returns just 'False'. So, applying this patch restores the 'dependency.unknown' check that wasn't working for some time. As a result, I

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix atom.blocker checks.

2014-08-04 Thread Michał Górny
The original checks assume that no-blocker is denoted as 'None'. However, currently atom.blocker returns just 'False'. --- bin/repoman | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/repoman b/bin/repoman index 9c5d720..71fc7f0 100755 --- a/bin/repoman +++ b/bin/repom