On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 12:32:28PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> I question the usefulness of producing warnings that people probably
> want to ignore anyway, but I suppose we could make the
> Manifest.checkTypeHashes method implement this behavior internally.
Ok, then I'd like to flip your default
On 11/24/2016 02:24 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:04:54PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
>> The current GLEP 60 draft specifies that non-strict handling of MISC
>> digests should be supported.
> In my followup post about how it should work, I noted that in non-strict
>
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 11:04:54PM -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
> The current GLEP 60 draft specifies that non-strict handling of MISC
> digests should be supported.
In my followup post about how it should work, I noted that in non-strict
mode, a non-fatal warning should be issued for the mismatch of
On 11/24/2016 12:14 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:04:54 -0800
> Zac Medico wrote:
>
>> This setting determines whether digests are checked for files declared
>> in the Manifest with MISC type (includes ChangeLog and metadata.xml
>> files). Defaults to true.
On Wed, 23 Nov 2016 23:04:54 -0800
Zac Medico wrote:
> This setting determines whether digests are checked for files declared
> in the Manifest with MISC type (includes ChangeLog and metadata.xml
> files). Defaults to true.
>
> The current GLEP 60 draft specifies that
This setting determines whether digests are checked for files declared
in the Manifest with MISC type (includes ChangeLog and metadata.xml
files). Defaults to true.
The current GLEP 60 draft specifies that non-strict handling of MISC
digests should be supported.
X-Gentoo-Bug: 600128