Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.2-rc3 parallel merges quit being parallel

2008-07-27 Thread René 'Necoro' Neumann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan schrieb: > Also, a little monitoring utility that could be run in another terminal > and just list and update all the currently merging packages, and any that > had failed to merge, so I could take a look at them while the system is > still w

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.2-rc3 parallel merges quit being parallel

2008-07-26 Thread Marius Mauch
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:56:20 -0500 Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Duncan wrote: > > "--jobs=10 --keep-going --load-average=15" > > For a dual-dual-core setup, a load average of 4.0 is "fully loaded". Only in ideal cases, when you have long-running processes hammering the cpu and lit

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.2-rc3 parallel merges quit being parallel

2008-07-26 Thread Zac Medico
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > For the first 100 or so packages, it worked quite well. However, about > there, maybe package 120 or so, so about 20% of the way thru, it reverted > to doing them one-at-a-time again. I'm now on package #279 and it's > still doing

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.2-rc3 parallel merges quit being parallel

2008-07-26 Thread Andrew Gaffney
Duncan wrote: "--jobs=10 --keep-going --load-average=15" For a dual-dual-core setup, a load average of 4.0 is "fully loaded". Anything higher than that and you're just causing jobs to queue up unnecessarily and your system to "thrash". have MAKEOPTS="-j -l20" so it's not going to be low al

[gentoo-portage-dev] portage-2.2-rc3 parallel merges quit being parallel

2008-07-26 Thread Duncan
So I'm running the 2.2-rcs and have been seeing blogs about the new parallel merge capacities... Having a dual-dual-core Opteron and having run multiple merges manually for some time, this is VERY welcome news. =8^) So after upgrading to -rc3 I set EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS to include "--jobs=10 --