On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 07:46:13PM +0200, Tambet wrote:
> Has anyone ever noticed that portage tree contains a lot of md5 hashes,
> which are not at all important for using it? I think that it does not make
> reliability or functionality smaller any bit if those would all stay in sync
> servers - a
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 19:46 +0200, Tambet wrote:
> Has anyone ever noticed that portage tree contains a lot of md5
> hashes, which are not at all important for using it? I think that it
> does not make reliability or functionality smaller any bit if those
> would all stay in sync servers - anyway,
Has anyone ever noticed that portage tree contains a lot of md5 hashes,
which are not at all important for using it? I think that it does not make
reliability or functionality smaller any bit if those would all stay in sync
servers - anyway, syncing would go much faster and this tree smaller. What
